anon post (II)

[wotanon]

/ime/ - Imeeji Idol Productions

---

[ Start a New Thread ]

Name
Spoiler?	[Spoiler?]
Options
Subject
Comment
Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

---

DAY 309 LiliS, sensitIV, pep!pep!, Taisho Roman Revolution, future is now, Heart Soldier Senshi, WILD CITY, AlcheME!, ☆ZRAEL, BARiTONES win (Astrael hosting)

DAY 311 Fanmail delivery

DAY 313 sensitIV, WILD CITY, ☆ZRAEL, AlcheME!, avante en garde and BARiTONES win (Wataru and Fox hosting)

---

---

shoulda saved the spicy theme for christmas amirite

---

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I do not think that sensitIV self-sacrifices.

[(Anonymous)]

lmao

[(Anonymous)]

What is lmao?

[(Anonymous)]

laughing my ass off

[(Anonymous)]

Why do you say that then?

[(Anonymous)]

because sensitiv definitely self sacrifices

[(Anonymous)]

I am not sure how you came to think that way.

[(Anonymous)]

observation

[(Anonymous)]

But we do not try to lose games.

[(Anonymous)]

no but you win games by sacrificing yourselves

[(Anonymous)]

we win games we are sure to win by following everyone else's lead :)

[(Anonymous)]

ah, wait, i mean "sure to LOSE" *

[(Anonymous)]

have you considered trying to survive instead of doing that

[(Anonymous)]

Is it not to your benefit during a game if sensitIV sacrifice themselves? Does that not mean less opponents you have to defeat?

[(Anonymous)]

it's to my benefit if you stop being a fucking idiot

[(Anonymous)]

I am not on sensitIV or Heart Soldier Senshi. Do you care for someone on those units that you are upset to see die? I feel like it does not make sense otherwise.

[(Anonymous)]

i don't like it when people don't look out for themselves

[(Anonymous)]

Even if looking out for themselves means taking your life?

[(Anonymous)]

obviously i won't just let them kill me, i'll fight back as much as i can

but i don't want them letting people kill them either

[(Anonymous)]

Could you elaborate why? I am simply curious as to where the desire may come from. What if it is more emotionally damaging for someone to kill as opposed to being killed? Why is taking the path of least personal suffering foolish?

[(Anonymous)]

We have tried to survive. We are not self-sacrificing for everyone, although it is true that we try to play in a manner that will not be overly cruel toward other units if it can be helped.

There is more than one of us responding here. I think what the other person meant is that we try to survive until it becomes clear that we do not have a chance of survival unless we win by a different mechanic, and then our only option for a full heal of some kind is to go for the win-lose option.

[(Anonymous)]

what about the sins game

[(Anonymous)]

We only did that because we didn't have numbers on our side. Who was going to spare us? The people most likely to have helped us all abstained from playing.

You are overestimating the number of people who would help us when up against other units.

[(Anonymous)]

we would have helped you if you asked

[(Anonymous)]

That is nice to know. I do not know if it would have made up the difference in the end but thank you.